Supervised Question Answering systems (QA systems) rely on domain-specific human-labeled data for training. Unsupervised QA systems generate their own question-answer training pairs, typically using secondary knowledge sources to achieve this outcome. Our approach (called PIE-QG) uses Open Information Extraction (OpenIE) to generate synthetic training questions from paraphrased passages and uses the question-answer pairs as training data for a language model for a state-of-the-art QA system based on BERT. Triples in the form of <subject, predicate, object> are extracted from each passage, and questions are formed with subjects (or objects) and predicates while objects (or subjects) are considered as answers. Experimenting on five extractive QA datasets demonstrates that our technique achieves on-par performance with existing state-of-the-art QA systems with the benefit of being trained on an order of magnitude fewer documents and without any recourse to external reference data sources.

问题答案（QA）是自然语言处理中最具挑战性的最具挑战性的问题之一（NLP）。问答（QA）系统试图为给定问题产生答案。这些答案可以从非结构化或结构化文本生成。因此，QA被认为是可以用于评估文本了解系统的重要研究区域。大量的QA研究致力于英语语言，调查最先进的技术和实现最先进的结果。然而，由于阿拉伯QA中的研究努力和缺乏大型基准数据集，在阿拉伯语问答进展中的研究努力得到了很大速度的速度。最近许多预先接受的语言模型在许多阿拉伯语NLP问题中提供了高性能。在这项工作中，我们使用四个阅读理解数据集来评估阿拉伯QA的最先进的接种变压器模型，它是阿拉伯语 - 队，ArcD，AQAD和TYDIQA-GoldP数据集。我们微调并比较了Arabertv2基础模型，ArabertV0.2大型型号和ARAElectra模型的性能。在最后，我们提供了一个分析，了解和解释某些型号获得的低绩效结果。

问题回答（QA）是信息检索和信息提取领域内的一项自然理解任务，由于基于机器阅读理解的模型的强劲发展，近年来，近年来，近年来的计算语言学和人工智能研究社区引起了很多关注。基于读者的质量检查系统是一种高级搜索引擎，可以使用机器阅读理解（MRC）技术在开放域或特定领域特定文本中找到正确的查询或问题的答案。 MRC和QA系统中的数据资源和机器学习方法的大多数进步尤其是在两种资源丰富的语言中显着开发的，例如英语和中文。像越南人这样的低资源语言见证了关于质量检查系统的稀缺研究。本文介绍了XLMRQA，这是第一个在基于Wikipedia的文本知识源（使用UIT-Viquad语料库）上使用基于变压器的读取器的越南质量检查系统，使用深​​层神经网络模型优于DRQA和BERTSERINI，优于两个可靠的QA系统分别为24.46％和6.28％。从三个系统获得的结果中，我们分析了问题类型对质量检查系统性能的影响。

知识库问题应答（KBQA）旨在在外部知识库的帮助下回答自然语言问题。核心思想是找到内部知识与知识库的已知三元组之间的内部知识之间的联系。 KBQA任务管道包含几个步骤，包括实体识别，关系提取和实体链接。这种管道方法意味着任何过程中的错误将不可避免地传播到最终预测。为了解决上述问题，本文提出了一种具有预培训语言模型（PLM）和知识图（KG）的语料库生成 - 检索方法（CGRM）。首先，基于MT5模型，我们设计了两个新的预训练任务：基于段落的知识屏蔽语言建模和问题，以获取知识增强型T5（KT5）模型。其次，在用一系列启发式规则预处理知识图的预处理之后，KT5模型基于处理的三元组生成自然语言QA对。最后，我们通过检索合成数据集直接解决QA。我们在NLPCC-ICCPOL 2016 KBQA数据集上测试我们的方法，结果表明，我们的框架提高了KBQA的性能，直接向前的方法与最先进的方法竞争。

在商业航空域中，有大量文件，例如事故报告（NTSB，ASRS）和监管指令（ADS）。有必要有效地访问这些多样化的存储库，以便在航空业中的服务需求，例如维护，合规性和安全性。在本文中，我们提出了一个基于深度学习的知识图（kg）基于深度学习（DL）的问题答案（QA）航空安全系统。我们从飞机事故报告中构建了知识图，并向研究人员社区贡献了这一资源。该资源的功效由上述质量保证系统测试和证明。根据上述文档构建的自然语言查询将转换为SPARQL（RDF图数据库的接口语言）查询并回答。在DL方面，我们有两个不同的质量检查模型：（i）BERT QA，它是通道检索（基于句子的）和问题答案（基于BERT）的管道，以及（ii）最近发布的GPT-3。我们根据事故报告创建的一系列查询评估系统。我们组合的QA系统在GPT-3上的准确性增长了9.3％，比Bert QA增加了40.3％。因此，我们推断出KG-DL的性能比单一表现更好。

自动问题应答（QA）系统的目的是以时间有效的方式向用户查询提供答案。通常在数据库（或知识库）或通常被称为语料库的文件集合中找到答案。在过去的几十年里，收购知识的扩散，因此生物医学领域的新科学文章一直是指数增长。因此，即使对于领域专家，也难以跟踪域中的所有信息。随着商业搜索引擎的改进，用户可以在某些情况下键入其查询并获得最相关的一小组文档，以及在某些情况下从文档中的相关片段。但是，手动查找所需信息或答案可能仍然令人疑惑和耗时。这需要开发高效的QA系统，该系统旨在为用户提供精确和精确的答案提供了生物医学领域的自然语言问题。在本文中，我们介绍了用于开发普通域QA系统的基本方法，然后彻底调查生物医学QA系统的不同方面，包括使用结构化数据库和文本集合的基准数据集和几种提出的方​​法。我们还探讨了当前系统的局限性，并探索潜在的途径以获得进一步的进步。

Recent progress in pretraining language models on large textual corpora led to a surge of improvements for downstream NLP tasks. Whilst learning linguistic knowledge, these models may also be storing relational knowledge present in the training data, and may be able to answer queries structured as "fillin-the-blank" cloze statements. Language models have many advantages over structured knowledge bases: they require no schema engineering, allow practitioners to query about an open class of relations, are easy to extend to more data, and require no human supervision to train. We present an in-depth analysis of the relational knowledge already present (without fine-tuning) in a wide range of state-of-theart pretrained language models. We find that (i) without fine-tuning, BERT contains relational knowledge competitive with traditional NLP methods that have some access to oracle knowledge, (ii) BERT also does remarkably well on open-domain question answering against a supervised baseline, and (iii) certain types of factual knowledge are learned much more readily than others by standard language model pretraining approaches. The surprisingly strong ability of these models to recall factual knowledge without any fine-tuning demonstrates their potential as unsupervised open-domain QA systems. The code to reproduce our analysis is available at https: //github.com/facebookresearch/LAMA.

大型基于变压器的预训练的语言模型在各种知识密集的任务上取得了令人印象深刻的表现，并可以在其参数中捕获事实知识。我们认为，考虑到不断增长的知识和资源需求，在模型参数中存储大量知识是亚最佳选择。我们认为，更有效的替代方法是向模型提供对上下文相关的结构化知识的明确访问，并训练它以使用该知识。我们提出了LM核 - 实现这一目标的一般框架 - 允许从外部知识源对语言模型培训的\ textit {解耦}，并允许后者更新而不会影响已经训练的模型。实验结果表明，LM核心获得外部知识，在知识探索任务上的最先进的知识增强语言模型中实现了重要而强大的优于性能。可以有效处理知识更新；并在两个下游任务上表现良好。我们还提出了一个彻底的错误分析，突出了LM核的成功和失败。

Question Answering (QA) is a growing area of research, often used to facilitate the extraction of information from within documents. State-of-the-art QA models are usually pre-trained on domain-general corpora like Wikipedia and thus tend to struggle on out-of-domain documents without fine-tuning. We demonstrate that synthetic domain-specific datasets can be generated easily using domain-general models, while still providing significant improvements to QA performance. We present two new tools for this task: A flexible pipeline for validating the synthetic QA data and training downstream models on it, and an online interface to facilitate human annotation of this generated data. Using this interface, crowdworkers labelled 1117 synthetic QA pairs, which we then used to fine-tune downstream models and improve domain-specific QA performance by 8.75 F1.

预审前的语言模型通过提供高质量的上下文化单词嵌入来显着改善了下游语言理解任务（包括提取性问题）的性能。但是，培训问答模型仍然需要大量特定域的注释数据。在这项工作中，我们提出了一个合作的自我训练框架RGX，用于自动生成更非平凡的问题 - 解答对以提高模型性能。 RGX建立在带有答案实体识别器，问题生成器和答案提取器的交互式学习环境的蒙版答案提取任务上。给定带有蒙版实体的段落，生成器会在实体周围生成一个问题，并培训了提取器，以提取蒙面实体，并使用生成的问题和原始文本。该框架允许对任何文本语料库的问题产生和回答模型进行培训，而无需注释。实验结果表明，RGX优于最先进的语言模型（SOTA）的语言模型，并在标准提问基准的基准上采用转移学习方法，并在给定的模型大小和传输学习设置下产生新的SOTA性能。

The General QA field has been developing the methodology referencing the Stanford Question answering dataset (SQuAD) as the significant benchmark. However, compiling factual questions is accompanied by time- and labour-consuming annotation, limiting the training data's potential size. We present the WikiOmnia dataset, a new publicly available set of QA-pairs and corresponding Russian Wikipedia article summary sections, composed with a fully automated generative pipeline. The dataset includes every available article from Wikipedia for the Russian language. The WikiOmnia pipeline is available open-source and is also tested for creating SQuAD-formatted QA on other domains, like news texts, fiction, and social media. The resulting dataset includes two parts: raw data on the whole Russian Wikipedia (7,930,873 QA pairs with paragraphs for ruGPT-3 XL and 7,991,040 QA pairs with paragraphs for ruT5-large) and cleaned data with strict automatic verification (over 160,000 QA pairs with paragraphs for ruGPT-3 XL and over 3,400,000 QA pairs with paragraphs for ruT5-large).

We present SpanBERT, a pre-training method that is designed to better represent and predict spans of text. Our approach extends BERT by (1) masking contiguous random spans, rather than random tokens, and (2) training the span boundary representations to predict the entire content of the masked span, without relying on the individual token representations within it. Span-BERT consistently outperforms BERT and our better-tuned baselines, with substantial gains on span selection tasks such as question answering and coreference resolution. In particular, with the same training data and model size as BERT large , our single model obtains 94.6% and 88.7% F1 on SQuAD 1.1 and 2.0 respectively. We also achieve a new state of the art on the OntoNotes coreference resolution task (79.6% F1), strong performance on the TACRED relation extraction benchmark, and even gains on GLUE. 1 * Equal contribution. 1 Our code and pre-trained models are available at https://github.com/facebookresearch/ SpanBERT.

该论文为罗马尼亚语提供了一个开放域的答案系统，回答了Covid-19相关问题。QA系统管道涉及自动问题处理，自动查询生成，Web搜索前10个最相关的文档，并使用用于提取质量质量质量质量质量质量质量的BERT模型回答提取，并在我们手动创建的COVID-19数据集上进行了培训。该论文将介绍质量检查系统及其与罗马尼亚语言技术的集成，COVID-19数据集以及对质量检查性能的不同评估。

最近有关增强基于BERT的语言表示模型的工作，具有知识图（KGS）对多个NLP任务具有有希望的结果。最先进的方法通常将原始输入句型与KGS中的三元组集成，并将组合的表示馈送到BERT模型中。然而，随着BERT模型的序列长度是有限的，除了原始输入句子之外，框架不能包含太多知识，因此被迫丢弃一些知识。对于那些输入的下游任务是一个很长的段落甚至是文档，例如QA或阅读理解任务，问题尤其严重。为了解决这个问题，我们提出屋顶，一个模型，具有两个底层臀部和融合层。其中一个底层伯特编码了知识资源，另一个伯特编码了原始输入句子，并且屋顶等融合层集成了伯特的编码。 QA任务的实验结果揭示了拟议模型的有效性。

近年来，低资源机器阅读理解（MRC）取得了重大进展，模型在各种语言数据集中获得了显着性能。但是，这些模型都没有为URDU语言定制。这项工作探讨了通过将机器翻译的队伍与来自剑桥O级书籍的Wikipedia文章和Urdu RC工作表组合的人生成的样本组合了机器翻译的小队，探讨了乌尔通题的半自动创建了数据集（UQuad1.0）。 UQuad1.0是一个大型URDU数据集，用于提取机器阅读理解任务，由49K问题答案成对组成，段落和回答格式。在UQuad1.0中，通过众包的原始SquAd1.0和大约4000对的机器翻译产生45000对QA。在本研究中，我们使用了两种类型的MRC型号：基于规则的基线和基于先进的变换器的模型。但是，我们发现后者优于其他人;因此，我们已经决定专注于基于变压器的架构。使用XLMroberta和多语言伯特，我们分别获得0.66和0.63的F1得分。

Open-domain question answering relies on efficient passage retrieval to select candidate contexts, where traditional sparse vector space models, such as TF-IDF or BM25, are the de facto method. In this work, we show that retrieval can be practically implemented using dense representations alone, where embeddings are learned from a small number of questions and passages by a simple dualencoder framework. When evaluated on a wide range of open-domain QA datasets, our dense retriever outperforms a strong Lucene-BM25 system greatly by 9%-19% absolute in terms of top-20 passage retrieval accuracy, and helps our end-to-end QA system establish new state-of-the-art on multiple open-domain QA benchmarks. 1 * Equal contribution 1 The code and trained models have been released at https://github.com/facebookresearch/DPR.

具有自然语言用户界面的软件具有越来越重要的重要性。但是，所包含的问题的质量答案（QA）功能仍然没有足够的问题才能正确回答。在我们的工作中，我们通过评估自然语言输入（即，用户的问题）和输出（即，系统的答案）来解决如何改进给定系统的QA质量的研究问题。我们的主要贡献是一种能够识别QA系统提供的错误答案的方法。因此，从答案候选列表中过滤不正确的答案导致高度提高的QA质量。特别是，我们的方法在许多情况下消除了它的潜力，大部分不正确的答案，与系统的未过滤输出相比，显着提高了QA质量。

Open-Domain Question Answering (ODQA) requires models to answer factoid questions with no context given. The common way for this task is to train models on a large-scale annotated dataset to retrieve related documents and generate answers based on these documents. In this paper, we show that the ODQA architecture can be dramatically simplified by treating Large Language Models (LLMs) as a knowledge corpus and propose a Self-Prompting framework for LLMs to perform ODQA so as to eliminate the need for training data and external knowledge corpus. Concretely, we firstly generate multiple pseudo QA pairs with background passages and one-sentence explanations for these QAs by prompting LLMs step by step and then leverage the generated QA pairs for in-context learning. Experimental results show our method surpasses previous state-of-the-art methods by +8.8 EM averagely on three widely-used ODQA datasets, and even achieves comparable performance with several retrieval-augmented fine-tuned models.

过去十年互联网上可用的信息和信息量增加。该数字化导致自动应答系统需要从冗余和过渡知识源中提取富有成效的信息。这些系统旨在利用自然语言理解（NLU）从此巨型知识源到用户查询中最突出的答案，从而取决于问题答案（QA）字段。问题答案涉及但不限于用户问题映射的步骤，以获取相关查询，检索相关信息，从检索到的信息等找到最佳合适的答案等。当前对深度学习模型的当前改进估计所有这些任务的令人信服的性能改进。在本综述工作中，根据问题的类型，答案类型，证据答案来源和建模方法进行分析QA场的研究方向。此细节随后是自动问题生成，相似性检测和语言的低资源可用性等领域的开放挑战。最后，提出了对可用数据集和评估措施的调查。

We present TriviaQA, a challenging reading comprehension dataset containing over 650K question-answer-evidence triples. TriviaQA includes 95K questionanswer pairs authored by trivia enthusiasts and independently gathered evidence documents, six per question on average, that provide high quality distant supervision for answering the questions. We show that, in comparison to other recently introduced large-scale datasets, TriviaQA (1) has relatively complex, compositional questions, (2) has considerable syntactic and lexical variability between questions and corresponding answer-evidence sentences, and (3) requires more cross sentence reasoning to find answers. We also present two baseline algorithms: a featurebased classifier and a state-of-the-art neural network, that performs well on SQuAD reading comprehension. Neither approach comes close to human performance (23% and 40% vs. 80%), suggesting that Trivi-aQA is a challenging testbed that is worth significant future study. 1