键形对于搜索和系统化学术文档至关重要。大多数用于键形提取的方法是针对文本中最重要的单词的提取。但是实际上，密钥拼列表通常包含明确出现在文本中的单词。在这种情况下，键形列表表示源文本的抽象摘要。在本文中，我们使用基于流行的变压器的模型进行试验，以使用四个基准数据集进行键形式提取，以进行抽象文本摘要。我们将获得的结果与常见的无监督和监督方法的结果进行了比较。我们的评估表明，按照全匹配的F1分数和BertScore的术语，汇总模型在生成钥匙串方面非常有效。但是，它们产生的许多单词在作者的键形列表中没有，这使得摘要模型在Rouge-1方面无效。我们还研究了几种订购策略来连接靶标键形。结果表明，策略的选择会影响键形生成的性能。

诸如学术文章和商业报告之类的长期文件一直是详细说明重要问题和需要额外关注的复杂主题的标准格式。自动汇总系统可以有效地将长文档置于简短而简洁的文本中，以封装最重要的信息，从而在帮助读者的理解中很重要。最近，随着神经体系结构的出现，已经做出了重大的研究工作，以推动自动文本摘要系统，以及有关将这些系统扩展到长期文档领域的挑战的大量研究。在这项调查中，我们提供了有关长期文档摘要的研究的全面概述，以及其研究环境的三个主要组成部分的系统评估：基准数据集，汇总模型和评估指标。对于每个组成部分，我们在长期汇总的背景下组织文献，并进行经验分析，以扩大有关当前研究进度的观点。实证分析包括一项研究基准数据集的内在特征，摘要模型的多维分析以及摘要评估指标的综述。根据总体发现，我们通过提出可能在这个快速增长的领域中提出未来探索的方向来得出结论。

Information overloading requires the need for summarizers to extract salient information from the text. Currently, there is an overload of dialogue data due to the rise of virtual communication platforms. The rise of Covid-19 has led people to rely on online communication platforms like Zoom, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Discord, etc. to conduct their company meetings. Instead of going through the entire meeting transcripts, people can use meeting summarizers to select useful data. Nevertheless, there is a lack of comprehensive surveys in the field of meeting summarizers. In this survey, we aim to cover recent meeting summarization techniques. Our survey offers a general overview of text summarization along with datasets and evaluation metrics for meeting summarization. We also provide the performance of each summarizer on a leaderboard. We conclude our survey with different challenges in this domain and potential research opportunities for future researchers.

查询聚焦的文本摘要（QFTS）任务旨在构建基于给定查询的文本文档摘要的构建系统。解决此任务的关键挑战是缺乏培训摘要模型的大量标记数据。在本文中，我们通过探索一系列域适应技术来解决这一挑战。鉴于最近在广泛的自然语言处理任务中进行预先接受的变压器模型的成功，我们利用此类模型为单文档和多文件方案的QFTS任务产生抽象摘要。对于域适应，我们使用预先训练的变压器的摘要模型应用了各种技术，包括转移学习，弱监督学习和远程监督。六个数据集的广泛实验表明，我们所提出的方法非常有效地为QFTS任务产生抽象摘要，同时在一组自动和人类评估指标上设置新的最先进的结果。

由于免费的在线百科全书具有大量内容，因此Wikipedia和Wikidata是许多自然语言处理（NLP）任务的关键，例如信息检索，知识基础构建，机器翻译，文本分类和文本摘要。在本文中，我们介绍了Wikides，这是一个新颖的数据集，用于为文本摘要问题提供Wikipedia文章的简短描述。该数据集由6987个主题上的80K英语样本组成。我们设置了一种两阶段的摘要方法 - 描述生成（I阶段）和候选排名（II阶段）作为一种依赖于转移和对比学习的强大方法。对于描述生成，与其他小规模的预训练模型相比，T5和BART表现出了优越性。通过将对比度学习与Beam Search的不同输入一起应用，基于度量的排名模型优于直接描述生成模型，在主题独立拆分和独立于主题的独立拆分中，最高可达22个胭脂。此外，第II期中的结果描述得到了人类评估的支持，其中45.33％以上，而I阶段的23.66％则支持针对黄金描述。在情感分析方面，生成的描述无法有效地从段落中捕获所有情感极性，同时从黄金描述中更好地完成此任务。自动产生的新描述减少了人类为创建它们的努力，并丰富了基于Wikidata的知识图。我们的论文对Wikipedia和Wikidata产生了实际影响，因为有成千上万的描述。最后，我们预计Wikides将成为从短段落中捕获显着信息的相关作品的有用数据集。策划的数据集可公开可用：https：//github.com/declare-lab/wikides。

Stack Overflow是最受欢迎的编程社区之一，开发人员可以为他们遇到的问题寻求帮助。然而，如果没有经验的开发人员无法清楚地描述他们的问题，那么他们很难吸引足够的关注并获得预期的答案。我们提出了M $ _3 $ NSCT5，这是一种自动从给定代码片段生成多个帖子标题的新颖方法。开发人员可以使用生成的标题查找密切相关的帖子并完成其问题描述。 M $ _3 $ NSCT5使用Codet5骨干，这是一种具有出色语言理解和发电能力的预训练的变压器模型。为了减轻歧义问题，即在不同背景下可以将相同的代码片段与不同的标题保持一致，我们提出了最大的边缘多元核抽样策略，以一次产生多个高质量和不同的标题候选者，以便开发人员选择。我们构建了一个大规模数据集，其中包含890,000个问题帖子，其中涵盖了八种编程语言，以验证M $ _3 $ NSCT5的有效性。 BLEU和胭脂指标的自动评估结果表明，M $ _3 $ NSCT5的优势比六个最先进的基线模型。此外，具有值得信赖结果的人类评估也证明了我们对现实世界应用方法的巨大潜力。

The research on text summarization for low-resource Indian languages has been limited due to the availability of relevant datasets. This paper presents a summary of various deep-learning approaches used for the ILSUM 2022 Indic language summarization datasets. The ISUM 2022 dataset consists of news articles written in Indian English, Hindi, and Gujarati respectively, and their ground-truth summarizations. In our work, we explore different pre-trained seq2seq models and fine-tune those with the ILSUM 2022 datasets. In our case, the fine-tuned SoTA PEGASUS model worked the best for English, the fine-tuned IndicBART model with augmented data for Hindi, and again fine-tuned PEGASUS model along with a translation mapping-based approach for Gujarati. Our scores on the obtained inferences were evaluated using ROUGE-1, ROUGE-2, and ROUGE-4 as the evaluation metrics.

自动摘要评估对于机器生成和人为生产的摘要都有用。自动评估给定文档的摘要文本启用，例如，摘要生成系统开发和检测不适当的摘要。摘要评估可以以多种模式进行：排名摘要生成系统；对特定文档的排名摘要；并在绝对规模上估算文档 - 苏格尔对的质量。带有注释的现有数据集用于摘要评估，通常基于新闻摘要数据集，例如CNN/DailyMail或XSUM。在这项工作中，我们描述了一个新的数据集，即播客摘要评估语料库，这是由TREC2020的人类专家评估的播客摘要集。与现有的摘要评估数据相比，该数据集具有两个独特的方面：（i）基于语音播客的长输入，文档； （ii）有机会在播客语料库中检测不适当的参考摘要。首先，我们检查了现有的评估方法，包括无模型和基于模型的方法，并为此长输入摘要评估数据集提供基准结果。其次，为了过滤参考参考文献配对以进行培训，我们采用摘要评估进行数据选择。这两个方面的实验结果为摘要评估和发电任务提供了有趣的见解。播客摘要评估数据可用。

大型和超大语言模型的开发，例如GPT-3，T5，Switch Transformer，Ernie等，已经显着改善了文本生成的性能。该领域的重要研究方向之一是产生具有争论的文本。该问题的解决方案可以用于商务会议，政治辩论，对话系统，以准备学生论文。这些应用的主要领域之一是经济领域。俄罗斯语言的论证文本生成的关键问题是缺乏注释的论证语料库。在本文中，我们将论证的微观版，说服力论文和UKP句子语料库的翻译版本用于微调Rubert模型。此外，该模型用于通过论证注释经济新闻的语料库。然后使用带注释的语料库微调Rugpt-3模型，该模型生成参数文本。结果表明，与原始RUGPT-3模型相比，这种方法将论点生成的准确性提高了20个百分点（63.2％对42.5％）。

文本生成的广泛使用的评估指标要么与更长的文本效果不错，要么无法评估文本质量的所有方面。在本文中，我们引入了一个名为SMART的新指标，以减轻此类限制。具体而言，我们将句子视为匹配的基本单位，而不是代币，并使用句子匹配函数来匹配匹配候选和参考句子。还将候选句子与源文件中的句子进行了比较，以允许接地（例如，事实）评估。我们的结果表明，我们提出的指标与基于模型的匹配函数的系统级相关性优于萨姆瓦尔摘要元评估数据集上的所有竞争指标指标。后者不使用任何神经模型，这在模型开发阶段很有用，在这些阶段，资源可以受到限制且需要快速评估。最后，我们还进行了广泛的分析，表明我们提出的指标与较长的摘要很好地运行，并且对特定模型的偏见较小。

Though many algorithms can be used to automatically summarize legal case decisions, most fail to incorporate domain knowledge about how important sentences in a legal decision relate to a representation of its document structure. For example, analysis of a legal case summarization dataset demonstrates that sentences serving different types of argumentative roles in the decision appear in different sections of the document. In this work, we propose an unsupervised graph-based ranking model that uses a reweighting algorithm to exploit properties of the document structure of legal case decisions. We also explore the impact of using different methods to compute the document structure. Results on the Canadian Legal Case Law dataset show that our proposed method outperforms several strong baselines.

Information extraction from scholarly articles is a challenging task due to the sizable document length and implicit information hidden in text, figures, and citations. Scholarly information extraction has various applications in exploration, archival, and curation services for digital libraries and knowledge management systems. We present MORTY, an information extraction technique that creates structured summaries of text from scholarly articles. Our approach condenses the article's full-text to property-value pairs as a segmented text snippet called structured summary. We also present a sizable scholarly dataset combining structured summaries retrieved from a scholarly knowledge graph and corresponding publicly available scientific articles, which we openly publish as a resource for the research community. Our results show that structured summarization is a suitable approach for targeted information extraction that complements other commonly used methods such as question answering and named entity recognition.

Text summarization is a user-preference based task, i.e., for one document, users often have different priorities for summary. As a key aspect of customization in summarization, granularity is used to measure the semantic coverage between the summary and source document. However, developing systems that can generate summaries with customizable semantic coverage is still an under-explored topic. In this paper, we propose the first unsupervised multi-granularity summarization framework, GranuSum. We take events as the basic semantic units of the source documents and propose to rank these events by their salience. We also develop a model to summarize input documents with given events as anchors and hints. By inputting different numbers of events, GranuSum is capable of producing multi-granular summaries in an unsupervised manner. Meanwhile, we annotate a new benchmark GranuDUC that contains multiple summaries at different granularities for each document cluster. Experimental results confirm the substantial superiority of GranuSum on multi-granularity summarization over strong baselines. Further, by exploiting the event information, GranuSum also exhibits state-of-the-art performance under the conventional unsupervised abstractive setting. Dataset for this paper can be found at: https://github.com/maszhongming/GranuDUC

Neural models that do not rely on pre-training have excelled in the keyphrase generation task with large annotated datasets. Meanwhile, new approaches have incorporated pre-trained language models (PLMs) for their data efficiency. However, there lacks a systematic study of how the two types of approaches compare and how different design choices can affect the performance of PLM-based models. To fill in this knowledge gap and facilitate a more informed use of PLMs for keyphrase extraction and keyphrase generation, we present an in-depth empirical study. Formulating keyphrase extraction as sequence labeling and keyphrase generation as sequence-to-sequence generation, we perform extensive experiments in three domains. After showing that PLMs have competitive high-resource performance and state-of-the-art low-resource performance, we investigate important design choices including in-domain PLMs, PLMs with different pre-training objectives, using PLMs with a parameter budget, and different formulations for present keyphrases. Further results show that (1) in-domain BERT-like PLMs can be used to build strong and data-efficient keyphrase generation models; (2) with a fixed parameter budget, prioritizing model depth over width and allocating more layers in the encoder leads to better encoder-decoder models; and (3) introducing four in-domain PLMs, we achieve a competitive performance in the news domain and the state-of-the-art performance in the scientific domain.

The publication rates are skyrocketing across many fields of science, and it is difficult to stay up to date with the latest research. This makes automatically summarizing the latest findings and helping scholars to synthesize related work in a given area an attractive research objective. In this paper we study the problem of citation text generation, where given a set of cited papers and citing context the model should generate a citation text. While citation text generation has been tackled in prior work, existing studies use different datasets and task definitions, which makes it hard to study citation text generation systematically. To address this, we propose CiteBench: a benchmark for citation text generation that unifies the previous datasets and enables standardized evaluation of citation text generation models across task settings and domains. Using the new benchmark, we investigate the performance of multiple strong baselines, test their transferability between the datasets, and deliver new insights into task definition and evaluation to guide the future research in citation text generation. We make CiteBench publicly available at https://github.com/UKPLab/citebench.

多文件摘要（MDS）是信息聚合的有效工具，它从与主题相关文档集群生成信息和简洁的摘要。我们的调查是，首先，系统地概述了最近的基于深度学习的MDS模型。我们提出了一种新的分类学，总结神经网络的设计策略，并进行全面的最先进的概要。我们突出了在现有文献中很少讨论的各种客观函数之间的差异。最后，我们提出了与这个新的和令人兴奋的领域有关的几个方向。

Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT; Devlin et al. 2019) represents the latest incarnation of pretrained language models which have recently advanced a wide range of natural language processing tasks. In this paper, we showcase how BERT can be usefully applied in text summarization and propose a general framework for both extractive and abstractive models. We introduce a novel document-level encoder based on BERT which is able to express the semantics of a document and obtain representations for its sentences. Our extractive model is built on top of this encoder by stacking several intersentence Transformer layers. For abstractive summarization, we propose a new fine-tuning schedule which adopts different optimizers for the encoder and the decoder as a means of alleviating the mismatch between the two (the former is pretrained while the latter is not). We also demonstrate that a two-staged fine-tuning approach can further boost the quality of the generated summaries. Experiments on three datasets show that our model achieves stateof-the-art results across the board in both extractive and abstractive settings. 1

ROUGE is a standard automatic evaluation metric based on n-grams for sequence-to-sequence tasks, while cross-entropy loss is an essential objective of neural network language model that optimizes at a unigram level. We present differentiable n-gram objectives, attempting to alleviate the discrepancy between training criterion and evaluating criterion. The objective maximizes the probabilistic weight of matched sub-sequences, and the novelty of our work is the objective weights the matched sub-sequences equally and does not ceil the number of matched sub-sequences by the ground truth count of n-grams in reference sequence. We jointly optimize cross-entropy loss and the proposed objective, providing decent ROUGE score enhancement over abstractive summarization dataset CNN/DM and XSum, outperforming alternative n-gram objectives.

上下文：堆栈溢出对于寻求编程问题答案的软件开发人员非常有帮助。先前的研究表明，越来越多的问题质量低，因此从潜在的答案者那里获得了更少的关注。 Gao等。提出了一个基于LSTM的模型（即BilstM-CC），以自动从代码片段中生成问题标题，以提高问题质量。但是，只有在问题主体中使用代码段无法为标题生成提供足够的信息，而LSTMS无法捕获令牌之间的远程依赖性。目的：本文提出了基于深度学习的新型模型CCBERT，旨在通过充分利用整个问题主体的双模式信息来增强问题标题生成的性能。方法：CCBERT遵循编码器范式范式，并使用Codebert将问题主体编码为隐藏的表示形式，堆叠的变压器解码器以生成预测的代币，以及附加的复制注意层来完善输出分布。编码器和解码器都执行多头自我注意操作，以更好地捕获远程依赖性。本文构建了一个数据集，该数据集包含大约200,000个高质量问题，该数据从Stack Overflow正式发布的数据中滤除，以验证CCBERT模型的有效性。结果：CCBERT优于数据集上的所有基线模型。对仅代码和低资源数据集进行的实验表明，CCBERT的优势性能较小。人类评估还显示了CCBERT关于可读性和相关标准的出色表现。

An optimal delivery of arguments is key to persuasion in any debate, both for humans and for AI systems. This requires the use of clear and fluent claims relevant to the given debate. Prior work has studied the automatic assessment of argument quality extensively. Yet, no approach actually improves the quality so far. Our work is the first step towards filling this gap. We propose the task of claim optimization: to rewrite argumentative claims to optimize their delivery. As an initial approach, we first generate a candidate set of optimized claims using a sequence-to-sequence model, such as BART, while taking into account contextual information. Our key idea is then to rerank generated candidates with respect to different quality metrics to find the best optimization. In automatic and human evaluation, we outperform different reranking baselines on an English corpus, improving 60% of all claims (worsening 16% only). Follow-up analyses reveal that, beyond copy editing, our approach often specifies claims with details, whereas it adds less evidence than humans do. Moreover, its capabilities generalize well to other domains, such as instructional texts.